CMI Insight
TodaySignalsMarketsPortfolio
More
Start hereCMI in four stepsMy tradesYour own trade journalDecisionsWhat CMI took or skippedLive testsForward tests and their limitsFunding carryCarry monitor and live testStrategyEvery rule and its testResults recordPublic, hash-chained recordReviewCharts of past tradesSystem statusData health and latencyHow to read CMISignals, badges and R explainedPlansFree during the betaFeedbackFour quick questionsCheck a signal channelSeven honest checksMethods we testedICT, SMC, Elliott Wave, laddersAbout CMIHow it works
Theme
Log in
TodaySignalsMarketsPortfolio
More
Start hereCMI in four stepsMy tradesYour own trade journalDecisionsWhat CMI took or skippedLive testsForward tests and their limitsFunding carryCarry monitor and live testStrategyEvery rule and its testResults recordPublic, hash-chained recordReviewCharts of past tradesSystem statusData health and latencyHow to read CMISignals, badges and R explainedPlansFree during the betaFeedbackFour quick questionsCheck a signal channelSeven honest checksMethods we testedICT, SMC, Elliott Wave, laddersAbout CMIHow it works
Theme
CMIInsight

Tested trading rules, live-tested records and market intelligence for the most liquid crypto futures. CMI places no orders.

How to read CMIPlansCheck a channelMethods we testedTermsPrivacy

Risk disclosure. CMI publishes rule-based market information and trade plans. It is not investment advice and not a personal recommendation. Crypto futures are highly volatile; leverage magnifies losses and stops can fill at worse prices in fast markets. Signals marked Live test come from rules still in their forward test. Past results do not predict future results. Trade only with money you can afford to lose.

We tested the methods everyone teaches

ICT, Smart Money Concepts, Elliott Wave, order flow and a “70 % win” ladder — written as fixed rules and tested on up to 6 years of Binance futures data, fees included.

Course adverts promise 7 to 9 winning trades out of 10. We wanted to know what these methods do when nobody can pick the good examples afterwards. So each method was written down as exact rules before any data was run, then tested once on up to 900 coins (including coins that were later delisted), from 2020 to 2026.

R = the amount you chose to risk on a trade. +2R means you won twice that amount; −1R means you lost it. Example: risk 10 USDT, then +2R = +20 USDT.

  1. The 70 % win ladder

    Loses

    Buy in three steps (now, −2 %, −4 %), take a small profit at +1.5 % from the average price, stop at −6 %.

    Trades
    116,857
    Win rate
    83 %
    Average
    −0.02R

    It really wins most trades. But an average win is +0.17R and an average loss −0.98R: one loss wipes out about six wins. It lost money in 6 of 7 years.

  2. The ladder with patience (no stop)

    Loses

    The same ladder, but wait as long as it takes for the small profit.

    Trades
    34,248
    Win rate
    98 %
    Average
    −0.54 % a trade

    Almost every trade comes back. The 2 % that do not (delisted or collapsed coins) lose about 72 % on average; one of them costs about 76 wins. Some trades waited more than three years.

  3. ICT

    Loses

    A London or New York session sweep of the Asian range, a fair value gap, then a limit entry in the 62–79 % “OTE” zone, target 2R.

    Trades
    27,527
    Win rate
    32 %
    Average
    −0.12R

    Lost money in every year from 2020 to 2025.

  4. Smart Money Concepts (SMC)

    No edge

    Liquidity sweep, break of structure, then an entry on the fair value gap (4-hour chart).

    Trades
    256
    Win rate
    —
    Average
    +0.02R

    About break-even after fees on 20 coins it had never seen.

  5. Order flow

    Loses

    Price makes a lower low while buyers' volume (CVD from Binance taker volume) makes a higher low, then a reversal candle.

    Trades
    162,425
    Win rate
    39 %
    Average
    −0.03R

    No edge on either the long or the short side.

  6. Elliott Wave

    Small edge

    After a first swing and a 50–79 % pullback, enter when price passes the end of the first swing (“wave 3”); target 1.618 × the first swing.

    Trades
    8,775
    Win rate
    53 %
    Average
    +0.11R / +0.06R

    +0.11R per trade on 189 listed coins, but only +0.06R on 706 other coins incl. delisted ones, and about flat in 2026. Positive, yet below our bar for Daily Picks. Its short side alone runs as an experimental beta on Telegram (shorts only, at most 2 a day), unproven, with its own live record.

    EW1 beta live record →

Why a high win rate can still lose

A method that takes small profits and holds on to losing trades wins most of the time. The screenshots are real. But the few big losses decide the result, and they rarely appear in a channel. Always ask for the average result per trade and the biggest loss, not the win rate.

What did hold up

  • Slow rules: daily trend following with a wide stop. It wins only about a third of its trades, and a few long trends pay for the rest.
  • Funding carry, which collects funding payments instead of predicting price.
  • Every short-timeframe rule we tried (scalps, 15-minute and 1-hour setups) lost to fees.

Every test, passed and failed, is on the Strategy page.

Join the free beta ↗How to check a signal channel

Research on past data, with fees and slippage; funding was not included for these tests. Past results do not promise future ones. This page is general information, not advice, and it is not about any particular channel or course.